 |
This is an Anti-War webpage, put up here by an effort of increasing conscience. I was watching an anti-war Youtube video...also shown below: when I saw this image, I paused the video as I found this image to be poignant and profound. Look at it yourself for a few minutes.
How old is she? nine or ten maybe, if so, then all she knows is war in her country because that's how long it has now been raging for, over nine years at time of writing. She is one victim from a million victims, how many of her family and friends have been killed in someone's else's don't give a damn war. When we look deeper into this photo, a few things become more apparent to us. The first thing we notice is that her right leg is a prosthetic one, her real leg was presumably lost during an explosion of some ordnance near her, be it a land mine, cluster bomb, missile or bullets...does it really matter which? Her left hand also looks injured as does her left leg, bruised and reddened. She is resting on crutches and is probably not too well, but with all her despair, as she looks around, there is an air of optimism about her, a faint smile begins to emerge on her young face. She must have been in a great deal of trauma and stress with those injuries along with her desperate circumstances, however, her spirit is still strong, her love of life is stronger, despite all the misery around her. She is a very strong and very brave, resilient little girl. She is wearing nice clothes, her head scarf looks clean and new as does her dress and blouse. Bought for her by loving discerning parents and family? or the Red Cross. She is or was, someone's beautiful much thought of daughter, much loved and cared for. Where are her family now? are they still alive ? we may never know. Is that pile of rubble behind her the remains of her house where she once lived? is that where her family were killed? there is a strong possibility this is correct, considering the brutality of war going on over there. So I thought about making a webpage based solely on this photo, obviously it would be an anti-war webpage and maybe this is not a bad idea. After all why are our soldiers over there if not on a crusade of exploitation? Oil and Opium fields under Western Government ownership equals a lot of money, power and control all in one basket. I have a section on my website about Military and World War Two, that is because my site is a growing reference site and hypocrisy is not intended. I do however admit that this particular web page is biased against war and its meant to be.
The Invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan in comparison with World War Two scenarios. What is the difference between Hitler's soldiers in World War Two France and our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan? Answer: As I will show you, its not a lot... ...our soldiers are an army of occupation. In WWII Occupied France, German soldiers were the army of occupation. Hitler stated that his army was in fact liberating France. Our army says it is in fact liberating Afghanistan/Iraq. The French resistance fighters were called dirty terrorists by Hitler. The Afghan, Iraq Resistance fighters are called dirty terrorists by us. The French resistance fighters blew up road checkpoints, trucks, trains, tanks, cars, military buildings whilst their snipers killed military personnel. The Afghan/Iraq Resistance fighters do exactly the same, but we call them terrorists as the Germans called the French resistance. France was controlled under martial law. Iraq and Afghanistan is controlled under martial law. Hitler's forces held the right to shoot to kill on the spot anyone that they suspected of insurgency, our forces does exactly the same.
The French populace were constantly militaristically terrorised and threatened with arrests, executions and ordered to follow curfews and other martial regulations. Anyone found bearing arms would be arrested (even a farmer with a shotgun), interrogated or even shot on the spot. Houses were raided, families were torn apart as people were arrested, taken away interrogated and tortured...The Gestapo knew their trade. Our forces are doing exactly the same. In fact, Former President of the United States, George W Bush admitted that the waterboarding of suspects had been carried out by the CIA and was perfectly alright. The Gestapo also used waterboarding to torture and interrogate suspects.
Hitler's Luftwaffe initially accidentally bombed residential areas and consequently killed innocents by the hundred, but stated they were really after military targets and their bombs went astray. Our Air forces do the same thing. Hitler's forces violated civil rights all the time. Civil rights are violated whenever a person is, placed in threat, anguish, peril, pain, intimidation, humiliation, fear of death, restrained from liberty, actual bodily harm or actual death. Our forces violate civil rights whenever they commit any one of these acts. Sadly, the civil rights of Afghan and Iraqi civilians are being violated by our forces. It is a war, so yes, our forces rights are also being violated, pulling them out is the solution for this. During Barrack Obama's Presidential campaigning, he promised he would pull all of the troops out of Iraq. This was an orchestrated lie of course, as when in office he actually sent more troops in. This is not my point though, but what is, is that he promised the criteria he knew the population wanted to hear because he knew it would have been the right thing to do, or he would not have said it. Therefore he knows what he is doing is wrong by sending more troops in by indirectly admitting it. When innocent women and children are brought into this equation of their civil rights being violated, then questions must be asked and answers must to be sought and solutions satisfactorily arrived at. Looking the other way or retreating into your domesticated bubble isn't going to change any circumstances for anyone, you have to disagree with it and make your disagreement known.
You must poll, petition, speak out, broadcast,
advertise or even sit
down and make a web page
A word of warning though, anyone who did not agree with or questioned Hitler and his methods were labelled as dangerous insurrectionists, were ultimately arrested as political terrorists and ended up in a concentration camp ( U.S equivalent: Abu Ghraib ) or simply got shot. My having this web page would put me in the same category, even though I categorically deny being a terrorist or sympathetic towards opposing forces. I am stating stark fact and I am not supporting a war that has absolutely nothing to do with us whatsoever. We all know, or should do by now that the 9-11 WTC was an inside job, construed for the advancement of global political ambition via waging a war.
"Military men are dumb stupid animals, to be used as pawns for
foreign policy."
|
to
voice your disagreement, individually or en mass, but do it peacefully.
During your protest, do not disrespect or contravene the human rights of
the authorities, yes they have them as well.
