![]() |
YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU...TO DIE The biggest conspiracy ever is to cajole men to become soldiers, to carry a gun, go overseas and fight, die or get maimed whilst shooting someone because he is told to. He does this to protect the interests of some wealthy world leader who is feeling a bit insecure. Imagine Adolf Hitler wanting to invade Poland but no-one picked up a gun and there were no soldiers...he would have gone back into doing his paintings! Below are actually two of Hitler's artworks. Actually they not too bad, good perspective and attention to detail...
Its a pity that he persuaded his countrymen to pick up guns, instead of a paintbrush...World War II may never have occurred.
Fight for your country. Your country needs you. Join the Marines. Join the army. These advertisements are dreamed up by the wealthy ruling elite who never fight for their country themselves, they get the soldier to fight for their country instead. From the wealthy ruling elitist perspective, this is a most sensible idea, I agree it is indeed very sensible...so...Go geddum Jarn! ----------------------------------------- Below is the entire unedited transcript of a speech that
was made by a soldier who saw the light after he returned
from Iraq...
" I tried hard to be proud of my service. but
all I could feel was shame. Racism could no longer mask the reality of
the occupation. These were people. These were human beings. I've since
been plagued by guilt anytime I see an elderly man, like the one who
couldn't walk, who we rolled onto a stretcher and told the Iraqi police
to take him away.
I feel guilt anytime I see a mother with her
children, like the one who cried hysterically and screamed that we were
worse than Saddam, as we forced her from her home. I feel guilt anytime I
see a young girl, like the one I grabbed by the arm and dragged into the
street. We are told we are fighting terrorists. The real terrorist was
me and the real terrorism is this occupation.
Racism within the military has long been an
important tool to justify the destruction and occupation of another
country. It's long been used to justify the killing, subjugation and
torture of another people. Racism is a vital weapon employed by this
government. It is a more important weapon than a rifle, a tank, a bomber
or a battleship. It's more destructive than an artillery shell, a
bunker buster or a Tomahawk missile.
While those weapons are created and owned by this
government, they are harmless without people willing to use them. Those
who send us to war do not have to pull a trigger or lob a mortar round. They do not have to fight the war. They merely have to sell the war. They need a public who is willing to send their soldiers into harm's
way. They need soldiers who are willing to kill and be killed without
question.
They can spend millions on a single bomb but that
bomb only becomes a weapon when the ranks in the military are willing to
follow orders to use it. They can send every last soldier anywhere on
Earth, but there'll only be a war if soldiers are willing to fight. And
the ruling class, the billionaires who profit from human suffering care
only about expanding their wealth and controlling the world economy. Understand that their power lies only in their ability to convince us
that war, oppression and exploitation is in our interest.
They understand that their wealth is dependent on
their ability to convince the working class to die to control the market
of another country. And convincing us to kill and die is based on their
ability to make us think that we are somehow superior.
Soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen have nothing to
gain from this occupation. The vast majority of people living in the US
have nothing to gain from this occupation. In fact, not only do we have
nothing to gain, but we suffer more because of it. We lose limbs, endure
trauma and give our lives. Our families have to watch flag draped
coffins lowered into the earth. Millions in this country without health
care, jobs or access to education must watch as this government squanders
over 450 million dollars a day on this occupation. Poor and working
people in this country are sent to kill poor and working people in
another country to make the rich richer.
Without racism soldiers would realize that they
have more in common with the Iraqi people than they do with the
billionaires who send us to war. I threw families onto the street in
Iraq only to come home and find families thrown onto the street in this
country in this tragic, tragic and unnecessary foreclosure crisis. We
need to wake up and realize that our real enemies are not in some
distant land and not people whose names we don't know and cultures we
don't understand.
The enemy is people we know very well and people
we can identify. The enemy is a system that wages war when it's
profitable. The enemy are the CEO's who lay us off our jobs when it's
profitable. It's the insurance companies who deny us health care when
it's profitable. It's the banks who take away our homes when it's
profitable. Our enemy is not 5,000 miles away. They are right here at
home.
If we organize and fight with our sisters and
brothers we can stop this war. We can stop this government and we
can create a better world.
----------------------------------------- Get out of the brainwashed false
belief system that you are owned. Contrary to what everyone is
told, it is not your duty to fight for your country and it is not your
duty to die for your country, let those who declare war do the fighting.
You do not owe anybody anything for simply being alive where you are
right now...in fact its the wealthy elite who owe you! Its funny how its your country when there is a war
on, when there is no war on then its not your country, as you pay, pay
and pay again for every last thing. Soldiers coming home from war
go straight onto welfare...it they are lucky. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR, YES, I OBJECT
TO THEIR CONSCIENCE
People should hold higher opinions of
themselves, they are not just dogs to do their masters bidding.
Imagine if everyone and I do mean everyone threw their
army conscription drafts into the bin, ( As Bill Clinton allegedly did )
what could they do? Answer...nothing. So...Refuse to kill,
period. Below is a famous speech, made in 1940
by Prime Minister, Winston S Churchill. The words in brackets were
added afterwards, by an unknown contributor. We shall fight them on the beaches
(or at least you will) we shall fight them on
the landing grounds (or at least you will) we shall
fight in the fields (or at least you will) and in the
streets (or at least you will) we shall fight in the
hills (or at least you will) we shall never
surrender (or at least you won't) They are always making war out to be a
glorious thing to get involved in. Be a tough guy, be a real
warrior, be a real man, wear a cammo uniform or black para gear, carry a
big macho gun, shoot and kill. Be professional, be decisive.
In reality...be an efficient killer of men, their families and their
children.
What reason are you going to shoot
him for? because you have been told to! I 'm sorry...I don't understand,
could you explain it to me please. Well...er... They make it sound alright, that
soldiering is the thing to do, but they wont show you a soldier who has
had half his face or arms and legs blown off, or a paraplegic in a
wheelchair on welfare, as a result of fighting their war. Soldiers are similar to the police in
that they enforce their leaders policies, regardless of how asinine.
These leaders never do the fighting or policing themselves of course,
they pay the robot his 20 grand a year to do it. I bet the shoes
that David Rockefeller wears are worth more than 20 grand, this kind of
money is peanuts to these guys who finance war to the tune of 100
million dollars a day. CONSCIOUS EFFORT
Soldiers are all ages, it is not just
grown men who have been indoctrinated that firepower is the best way to
go for a nation. Africa is rife with this lie and children pick up
widely available AK47's and off to war they go. If a person shoots someone who is trying to steal his
car he will be imprisoned, but if a person shoots someone who has never
offended him, in someone else's country in someone else's war, then he
will get praised for it. If he refuses, then he is branded a coward by
the cowards themselves. Its a twisted, reversed mentality.
So, be smart, be wise, understand soldiering for what it is, then leave
it, drop your gun and walk away and no-one needs to be killed again.
I emphasize though that both sides have to drop their guns, for if one
doesn't, the other can't either. It will take a conscious effort.
Every single soldier who survives war and comes home should get rewarded, because they risked their lives for their country. Of course they don't get rewarded, its often the opposite. The Gulf war veteran who had his house repossessed as he could not afford the payments or the senior citizen and WWII veteran who was evicted for missing payments only to have his house GIVEN to asylum seekers. Fought for his country did he?....so much for that. The short term, convenient and selective memories of our leaders are evident when it comes to any payback. Soldiers should be rewarded with large houses, thousands of dollars, a free top of the range automobile, prestige, fame and high status. Instead they get nothing, maybe a relatively worthless medal to appease them. If medals are precious, valued and honorable items how come they are never made from precious metals?
The soldier comes home from active service, leaves the armed forces and goes back home to nothing in particular, no reward at all...is that fair? is that right? It should be the awarding of a $1million bonus per soldier on his return and the leaders could afford this very easily...but it would grieve them to do so.
So who is the soldier fighting for? his wife, his son, his family, his girlfriend, his friends or none of the above? Its none of the above, because he fights for the leaders and their wishes. Really very stupid isn't it, that we have allowed this to happen when we should just collectively say a resounding No! The leaders are basically saying " Go to Afghanistan, go to Iraq and kill for me, so I can get rich off their oil, their opium and their real estate, whilst my very safe position and control over you is quantified all the more. "
Who sends a soldier to fight? Royalty does, but they never fight or put themselves at risk. Aristocracy does, but they never fight or put themselves at risk. The upper classes do but usually join the army as high ranking officers and stay in the rear echelons. A high ranking officer in combat never shouts " Follow me " Who else sends a soldier to fight? High court Judges do, but they never fight or put themselves at risk. Politicians do but they never fight or put themselves at risk. Millionaires like the Rockefeller's, and the Rothschild's also do but they never fight or put themselves at risk. Leaders actually make money from war as they capitalize on all the arms and munitions contracts and divvy up the spoils between them when the war is over. None of these leaders, throughout the ages have ever fought or put themselves at risk, they get a soldier to fight instead and treat the soldier with contempt when they do. A soldier should wake up and drop his weapon, take that uniform off and never to enforce the leaders agendas again. Refuse to fight, refuse to kill, tell them to do it themselves instead. If a world leader had to pick up that AK47 or M4 rifle and fight in war then I would guarantee that there would be no more war ever again.
Royalty, aristocracy, the upper classes, judges, politicians and millionaires love to wear the uniforms though and strut around with delusions of grandeur, putting on airs and graces of superficial importance. They adorn and bedeck themselves in medals and decorations galore that they have not earned. They got their gongs by shouting from the rear " Advance men " In times of old they won their medals when they used to sit safely atop a hill, drinking port and co-ordinating the battle that was raging in the valley below. The aristocracy always went overboard with their importance and their grand titles, medals and decorations in times of war. They never fired a shot of course and really they should all have worn yellow apparel with white feathers in their caps. Below is seen Field Marshal Horatio Herbert Kitchener, amongst his other titles were: 1st Earl, Chief of Staff, Commander in Chief and Lord. He was also titled Earl Kitchener of Khartoum. He is wearing so many medals and decorations its a small wonder that the man could actually stand up un-assisted. He won the Battle of Omdurman in 1898 or at least the soldiers did...he was probably 100 miles away. He also fought in WWI...from behind his desk in London.
It was a portrait of Kitchener that was actually used for the majority of all WWI recruitment posters (seen below) that were posted throughout Britain in 1914.
More recently we see below, The Duke of Edinburgh, who is the husband of Queen Elizabeth II. He is wearing so many medals we have the distinct impression that he's a brave warrior. In fact the only time he ever walked on a battlefield was when the war was long over, another man who has never fired a shot, apart from hunting grouse on his estate. Full military regalia, importance, titles, badges, awards, decorations, medals galore, pomp and ceremony...these guys are full of it.
Ask a soldier what exactly are you fighting for ?..he will reply that he doesn't really know...they even have stupid stanzas " Mine is not to reason why, mine is just to do or die " Royalty, aristocracy and millionaires never use this stanza themselves of course. They have never died for their country
they get the soldier to die for their country Its like a schoolboy who decides to fight the school bully, he then cajoles his entire class to administer the beating in the playground. This is then carried out whilst he looks on from a classroom window. During assembly the next day, the entire school praises him for dealing with the bully.
Soldiers basically fight or die whilst trying to enforce another's policy. This policy maker is usually 100 or a 1000 miles away from the war whichever is safest. The two leaders below are non-combatants, despite one of them wearing full army uniform. They organize war but never fight in it themselves, if there was the remote possibility that they indeed had to fight in it themselves, would they be so eager to start a war?
As I said on another webpage...US Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger...who was a soldier himself before he got involved in politics, proved he was a hypocrite of hideous proportions when he stated: " Military men are just dumb stupid animals, to be used as pawns for foreign policy. " and that is what they really think of soldiers. Amongst other old army adages, here is an appropriate one: Officers and their ladies, NCO's and their wives, lower ranks and their women. The contempt is always there for the soldier. DEATH TOLL Where m = million, the death toll during WWII was 60m ± 10m. All because men picked up guns to be soldiers. The death toll included: Russia 25m, China 22m, Poland 7m, Germany 6m, Japan
4m. Yugoslavia 2m. France 1m. Greece 500,000.
Italy 500,000. Great Britain 325,000. United States 295,000 Holland
200,000.
Hungary 150,000. Canada 40,000. Australia 25,000.
India 25,000. Bulgaria 20,000. New Zealand 10,000 and South
Africa 6,000 with several other small nations losing perhaps several
thousand a piece. If all guns were made to shoot the person that fired them like the Nagant revolver parody on the left, then there would be a total amount of ZERO armed soldiers in the world. I am not saying that guns themselves are inherently bad, its the person that uses them or is ordered to use them that makes them what they are...life takers and widow makers. SPECIAL FORCES...A CONTRADICTION IN PERSPECTIVE
Special Forces paramilitaries such as
SAS, SWAT, S019, Delta Force, GSG9, Green Terrorists who blow up supermarkets, public trains, public buildings and public assembly areas do indeed need to be shot and killed. Terrorists don't care who they indiscriminately kill and they should be stopped at all costs, every time. Special Forces are in existence for this very purpose and I am glad that they are. So where do you draw the line between a terrorist who indiscriminately kills to further his agenda and the soldier who fires missiles into areas where civilians live, to further political agenda...its the same thing isn't it? Every man should otherwise not join any army. He is not being a "conshy " otherwise known as a conscientious objector, it is just objection...objection to the killing of others, period. Firearms should only be used on firing ranges for fun as an interesting pastime and never be used to kill another person even though that it their chief design. THE FINAL SHOT
Now imagine it is you who is next to be shot and killed, would you be concerned? yes I think you would be. Don't respond like the moron who told me " I ain't bothered if I get killed " what? you ain't bothered about losing your life...like I say...what a moron. I managed to get a photo of him below dealing with a fly that sat on his nose...
The final shot should be into the air. If every soldier refused to kill, if every soldier dropped his gun and walked away, the world would instantly become a much better and safer place to live in. Terrorists of course would never lay down their arms, but as stated...special forces can deal with those buggers. Remember if every single world leader who considered war as an option, had to fight in it themselves they would do everything in their power to avoid it. War would become illegal overnight and every gun on the planet would then only be used for sport and recreation purposes...world leaders would personally see to that...now wouldn't they... Created Tuesday July 26th 2011. Updated December 30th 2011. |